Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May, 2008

Juan Cole and Dr. iRack in their blogs tackle the intricacies of the two Iraqi-U.S. agreements now under negotiation in Baghdad, the SOFA and the SFA. Cole quotes al-Hayat:

[...] Those familiar with the current draft of the agreement say that it speaks of the establishment of 400 US military sites and bases through the country, of legal immunity for American troops and citizens, and an abrogation of any undertakings previously made, to share in the reconstruction of the country.

Here’s my question: if the Iraqi government — under pressure from, say, millions of demonstrators in all major cities — ends up rejecting the agreements, what then? Is it possible that in the end it’s not the next U.S. president who decides whether to draw down American forces, but — gasp — the Iraqis?

Read Full Post »

Thanks to modern military medicine, more soldiers’ lives have been saved in Iraq than in any other conflict. The downside is that the number of KIA no longer reflects the brutality of war — or its social costs. In other words, it’s the number of wounded we should be focusing on.

Here’s a graph from a new Congressional Research Service report:

Read Full Post »

Thanks, Abu

I don’t know anything about cricket, but in the right hands it makes for a really good metaphor:

How will Iraq end? Probably not with a clear-cut victor. It will probably end a draw. The U.S.-led coalition of the willing posted a huge first-innings score of 568 and followed it up by arrogantly fielding exclusively fast-bowlers and allowing the enemy to post a 367 in their first innings. (We must have thought we were the Windies c. 1982.) We then collapsed for a 97 in the second innings and are now desperately trying to hang on for the win in the enemy’s second innings. He might win. So might we. But at least we’ve got some spin bowlers on the field now.

Thanks for everything, Abu Muqawama.

Read Full Post »

After the widely advertised government “crackdown” in Mosul, things are returning to normal. The lesson, in caps: YOU DO NOT ELIMINATE AN INSURGENCY BY MASS DETENTIONS.

(Note to the Baghdad press corps: Please pull your head out of your butt and go report. No more blindly parroting the Maliki “al-Qaeda is on the run” meme, okay?)

Read Full Post »

The debate over al-Qaeda’s troubles continues over at Jihadica, where Will McCants and Michael Scheuer engage in polite discussion on exactly how serious this thing is.

McCants:

There is something to the recent meme that Scheuer is missing: these attacks from former prominent supporters or fellow travelers are severely damaging the publics’ opinion of AQ, especially among educated Salafis. The books or letters written by Awda or Sayyid Imam are carefully formulated criticisms of AQ from within the classical Islamic tradition, not silly there-is-no-violence-in-jihad arguments.

Scheuer:

I think the point I tired to make is that the recanters are just defeatists. Their recanting may be sincere, but it protects the status quo and offers no hope to those dissatisfied with U.S. policy and its impact, or those who are weary of Arab tyrants.

UPDATE:

“Al Qaeda near defeat, on defensive – CIA chief” — Reuters

Read Full Post »

Responding to allegations by former White House press secretary Scott McClellan that the Bush administration screwed up by invading Iraq, Condoleezza Rice said:

The one thing that I am certain was not a mistake was to liberate the Iraqi people from Saddam Hussein.

This is what’s called the WYPMC (“Would You Prefer the Mushroom Cloud”) argument, which the Bush White House has developed from the age-old WYRYWWR (“Would You Rather Your Wife Was Raped”) argument so successfully used by gun nuts everywhere.

Read Full Post »

Al-Qaeda: No nukes

So, is al-Qaeda about to go nuclear or what? Probably not, but the media debate has been entertaining. Jihadica, as always, provides good commentary on the chatter on jihadist web sites.

There is also chatter, this time in the Western media, about the supposedly impending unraveling of al-Qaeda. I wonder what exactly there is to unravel, but see for yourself:

“The Unraveling” — The New Republic

“The Rebellion Within” — The New Yorker

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.